I'd welcome it-javascript is a security disaster even for established browsers, and putting it into a small project like a terminal browser is calling for trouble. Get rid once and for all for everything javascript related. I have no experience with autoconf, but to me it looks like the generated scripts in the projects haven't been updated since 2004 and they fail some detection on recent systems. I needed to add a autoreconf -ifv to make it work, which I've also committed to the PKGBUILD. I've added the architectures you suggested. I tested this on a Pi 4 and it seems to run on aarch64-but I only made a quick test with default config. I didn't look through everything though.Įlinks-0.14 compiles fine, so I've switched to that branch for now (currently version 0.14.1). I've compared the 0.14.1 release tarball with the elinks-1.14 branch and couldn't tell if that's where the source comes from, because it looked like a different state of the project. Yes it's been like that on master for a while, and there haven't been any changes to that branch for all that time. I think it's that "infamous" ld linker thingy error again: Git version with Javascript disabled by default. To An advanced and well-established feature-rich text mode web browser. Guarantee that my "elinks-git" wont be able to execute any javascript at all in my computer ?Īnd if that is true, may I suggest that the PKGBUILD description be edited from: An advanced and well-established feature-rich text mode web browser. In case the developer "stuffs" javascript support by default, do these options in the PKGBUILD: -without-spidermonkey \ In that case, what I wanted to make sure is what I'll be getting in the future if I use this, "elinks-git" PKGBUILD. And if so, I assume the official Arch package will just follow that right ? And so the Arch official "elinks" package will support javascript. So, the main developer, rkd77, is still aiming at some sort of javascript support then. Just checked the master, I see JavaScript is currently disabled. I just randomly read this in the repo and assumed it was the project direction. But it doesn't look like the developers think that way For your comment and clarifying things !.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |